doc: specify thread safety for each data structure
The documentation of "Kernel/Data Structures" incorrectly states that 'all provided structures are uniformly unsynchronized; access to them is not threadsafe by default'. In reality, some of them are threadsafe and some are not. This might discourage users from using threadsafe data structures where applicable, or mislead users into adding unnecessary locks. This proposal addresses the issue by specifying thread safety for each provided data structure. My assessment of thread safety is based purely on source code analysis; hence an expert verification would be appreciated. Signed-off-by: Vukan Turkulov <vukant@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6cc28c78b7
commit
124aae3876
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -20,10 +20,12 @@ behind this design is to allow the collections to be used in contexts
|
|||
where dynamic allocation is disallowed (i.e. there is no need to
|
||||
allocate node objects because the memory is provided by the user).
|
||||
|
||||
Note also that these libraries are uniformly unsynchronized; access to
|
||||
Note also that these libraries are generally unsynchronized; access to
|
||||
them is not threadsafe by default. These are data structures, not
|
||||
synchronization primitives. The expectation is that any locking
|
||||
needed will be provided by the user.
|
||||
needed will be provided by the user. Some of the provided data
|
||||
structures are thread safe in specific usage scenarios (see
|
||||
:ref:`spsc_lockfree` and :ref:`mpsc_lockfree`).
|
||||
|
||||
.. toctree::
|
||||
:maxdepth: 1
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue