doc: review: switch labels to a definition list
Move labels docs from headers to a definition list. Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
22b1e70b08
commit
7ae2b5033e
1 changed files with 29 additions and 39 deletions
|
|
@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ Categories/Labels
|
||||||
-----------------
|
-----------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Hotfix
|
Hotfix
|
||||||
++++++
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Any change that is a fix to an issue that blocks developers from doing their
|
Any change that is a fix to an issue that blocks developers from doing their
|
||||||
daily work, for example CI breakage, Test breakage, Minor documentation fixes
|
daily work, for example CI breakage, Test breakage, Minor documentation fixes
|
||||||
that impact the user experience.
|
that impact the user experience.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -77,8 +75,6 @@ author) they can be merged with justification without review by one of the
|
||||||
project owners.
|
project owners.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Trivial
|
Trivial
|
||||||
+++++++
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Trivial changes are those that appear obvious enough and do not require maintainer or code-owner
|
Trivial changes are those that appear obvious enough and do not require maintainer or code-owner
|
||||||
involvement. Such changes should not change the logic or the design of a
|
involvement. Such changes should not change the logic or the design of a
|
||||||
subsystem or component. For example a trivial change can be:
|
subsystem or component. For example a trivial change can be:
|
||||||
|
|
@ -91,8 +87,6 @@ subsystem or component. For example a trivial change can be:
|
||||||
- Sample modifications to support additional configuration or boards etc.
|
- Sample modifications to support additional configuration or boards etc.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Maintainer
|
Maintainer
|
||||||
+++++++++++
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Any changes that touch the logic or the original design of a subsystem or
|
Any changes that touch the logic or the original design of a subsystem or
|
||||||
component will need to be reviewed by the code owner or the designated subsystem
|
component will need to be reviewed by the code owner or the designated subsystem
|
||||||
maintainer. If the code changes is initiated by a contributor or developer other
|
maintainer. If the code changes is initiated by a contributor or developer other
|
||||||
|
|
@ -101,14 +95,10 @@ have to drive the pull request to a mergeable state by giving feedback to the
|
||||||
author and asking for more reviews from other developers.
|
author and asking for more reviews from other developers.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Security
|
Security
|
||||||
+++++++++++
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Changes that appear to have an impact to the overall security of the system need
|
Changes that appear to have an impact to the overall security of the system need
|
||||||
to be reviewed by a security expert from the security working group.
|
to be reviewed by a security expert from the security working group.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
TSC and Working Groups
|
TSC and Working Groups
|
||||||
++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Changes that introduce new features or functionality or change the way the
|
Changes that introduce new features or functionality or change the way the
|
||||||
overall system works need to be reviewed by the TSC or the responsible Working
|
overall system works need to be reviewed by the TSC or the responsible Working
|
||||||
Group. For example for :ref:`breaking API changes <breaking_api_changes>`, the
|
Group. For example for :ref:`breaking API changes <breaking_api_changes>`, the
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue