doc: review: switch labels to a definition list
Move labels docs from headers to a definition list. Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
22b1e70b08
commit
7ae2b5033e
1 changed files with 29 additions and 39 deletions
|
|
@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ Categories/Labels
|
|||
-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
Hotfix
|
||||
++++++
|
||||
|
||||
Any change that is a fix to an issue that blocks developers from doing their
|
||||
daily work, for example CI breakage, Test breakage, Minor documentation fixes
|
||||
that impact the user experience.
|
||||
|
|
@ -77,8 +75,6 @@ author) they can be merged with justification without review by one of the
|
|||
project owners.
|
||||
|
||||
Trivial
|
||||
+++++++
|
||||
|
||||
Trivial changes are those that appear obvious enough and do not require maintainer or code-owner
|
||||
involvement. Such changes should not change the logic or the design of a
|
||||
subsystem or component. For example a trivial change can be:
|
||||
|
|
@ -91,8 +87,6 @@ subsystem or component. For example a trivial change can be:
|
|||
- Sample modifications to support additional configuration or boards etc.
|
||||
|
||||
Maintainer
|
||||
+++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
Any changes that touch the logic or the original design of a subsystem or
|
||||
component will need to be reviewed by the code owner or the designated subsystem
|
||||
maintainer. If the code changes is initiated by a contributor or developer other
|
||||
|
|
@ -101,14 +95,10 @@ have to drive the pull request to a mergeable state by giving feedback to the
|
|||
author and asking for more reviews from other developers.
|
||||
|
||||
Security
|
||||
+++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
Changes that appear to have an impact to the overall security of the system need
|
||||
to be reviewed by a security expert from the security working group.
|
||||
|
||||
TSC and Working Groups
|
||||
++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
Changes that introduce new features or functionality or change the way the
|
||||
overall system works need to be reviewed by the TSC or the responsible Working
|
||||
Group. For example for :ref:`breaking API changes <breaking_api_changes>`, the
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue